I think that in the world we live in today that there should be an equal balance when it comes to both art and sciences. Art and Science are key concepts that help our world go round and with combining these two ideas together the world itself could become a stronger unit. In this short passage, “We must Protect U.S. investment in Scientific Knowledge,” written by Mark B. Boslough, Congress view’s science as a waste of time but also, a major waste of money. Congress feels as is scientific knowledge does not relay enough information to the world. Congress expresses it setback about science, “They think that spending on science s like throwing money into a big hole in the ground,” as they do not agree with the trial and error ordeal. That with these types of test it is a waste and congress thinks the money could be spent elsewhere rather than the knowledge of science. If Boslough connected his idea’s back to the nature of art than Congress would believe the importance of science and how this concept contributes to the world. In comparison, “The Future of Science…is Art?” by John Lehere he mentions both the importance of how art and science correlate with one another. As the state, “In doing science, even though words and equations are used with intention of having precise meaning, it is almost impossible not to reason by physical analogy, no to form mental pictures, not to imagine balls bouncing and pendulums swinging.” With the help of art in science, it enables one’s mind to use images and the form of art to understand the bigger picture. Overall, with the power of art and science, it allows the mind to process the importance of how these two concepts come together as one.
You are absolutely well on your way. Strive to place more emphasis at the bottom of your paragraph. Slow down and really try to explain (in detail) how the connection between the two quotes advances/develops/complicates your claim sentence.